• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
California Health Advocates

California Health Advocates

  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Our Team
    • Mission
    • Education Services
    • About HICAP
    • Press
    • Testimonials
  • MEDICARE COUNSELING
  • Fact Sheets
  • Topics
    • The Basics
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Low-Income Help
    • Medigap
    • Medicare Advantage
    • Other Health Insurance
    • Appeals
    • Billing & Claims
    • Disabilities
    • Long-Term Care
    • Tribal Nations & Medicare
    • Health Care Reform
    • Advocacy & Policy
    • Glossary
  • Fraud & Abuse
  • Medicare Complaints
  • Blog
  • Donate

Medicare’s Proposed Changes to Hospital Admission Rules Don’t Address Root Concerns

California Health Advocates > News > Medicare Billings, Claims & Appeals > Medicare’s Proposed Changes to Hospital Admission Rules Don’t Address Root Concerns

Posted by Karen Joy Fletcher on May 8, 2013

“Observation status” is a hot topic amongst advocates and beneficiaries and is again back in the court room. Lois Frarie, a 93 year old retired teacher in Monterey, California, was left with a $19,000 bill for her skilled nursing home care after 4 days in the hospital. How can this be? While Medicare does cover up to 100 days of SNF care, it only does so if a beneficiary is admitted into the hospital as an inpatient for 3 consecutive days prior to receiving SNF care. Lois found out after the fact that she was held in “observation status” for 2 of her 4 days in the hospital. Therefore, Medicare did not cover her subsequent SNF care.

For some background, observation status has to do with how a hospital classifies a patient depending on the patient’s condition. A patient admitted as an inpatient is billed differently than a patient put under “observation” as an outpatient. In recent years, an increasing number of beneficiaries are being classified as under “observation” past the 24 to 48 hour time limit for observation status, which can have grave financial consequences for Medicare beneficiaries. In fact, the number of Medicare patients receiving observation care jumped 69% in 5 years, to 1.6 million in 2011, according to the most recent federal data.

At the same time as Lois is taking her case to court, Medicare officials have proposed some changes to hospital admission rules, hoping it will reduce the number of beneficiaries being placed in pro-longed observation status and then being ineligible for nursing home care coverage. Under the proposed changes, with some exceptions, if a doctor thinks a beneficiary will stay in the hospital for less than 2 days (or through 2 midnights), the beneficiary would be considered an outpatient and would receive observation care. If the doctor thinks the beneficiary will stay longer, the beneficiary would be admitted. Setting deadlines for observation stays would also limit the growing length of time of observation visits. Yet, such a deadline has supposedly already been in place (where, as mentioned above, observation status is not to exceed 24 to 48 hours), and in 2011 observation visits exceeding 24 hours nearly doubled to 744,748.

Many advocates, doctors and hospitals have expressed this proposal won’t work and won’t address some of the underlying issues. Namely, it does nothing to help beneficiaries in observation status because it keeps the 3-inpatient-days requirement in place; it doesn’t require hospitals to tell patients when they are held for observation; and it doesn’t give patients a right to appeal their observation status. Advocates, including CHA are advising the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to either drop the 3-day policy or count observation days toward the requirement. For years, this 3-day policy and the ability for patients to be held in observation status without them knowing about it or the consequences of it, has lead to great confusion and a huge amount of unexpected financial burden for beneficiaries.

Also, according to a recent news article, hospitals are still able to overrule the doctor’s decision to admit a patient. This just creates more confusion when a doctor bills Medicare for inpatient services and the hospital bills for outpatient/observations services.

For more information on this topic, see the following news articles:

In hospital under ‘observation’ care?  It can cost you, USA Today

Medicare Seeks to Limit Number of Seniors Placed in Hospital Observation Care, Kaiser Health News

Filed Under: Medicare Billings, Claims & Appeals

Previous Post: « Home for Life: An Innovative, Community-based Approach to Help Elders Age-in-Place
Next Post: Farewell & Gratitude to Marta! »

About Karen Joy Fletcher

Our blogger Karen Joy Fletcher is CHA's Communications Director. With a Masters in Public Health from UC Berkeley, she is the online "public face" of the organization, provides technical expertise, writing and research on Medicare and other health care issues. She is responsible for digital content creation, management of CHA’s editorial calendar, and managing all aspects of CHA’s social media presence. She loves being a "communicator" and enjoys networking and collaborating with the passionate people and agencies in the health advocacy field. See her current articles.

Related Posts

  • Hospital Discharge Planning is Key to Recovery
  • Medicare Covers COVID-19 Tests & CMS Issues Guidance to Medicare Advantage & Part D Plans
  • House Leaders Introduce Bills to Prevent COBRA from Biting People Eligible for Medicare
  • Alert ~ Delayed Billing for Medicare Part B Premium Payments in December 2018

Primary Sidebar

Change Text Size

  • 100%  110%  120%  130%  

News & Blog Categories

  • Medicare Advantage
  • Low-Income help
  • Medicare & Disabilities
  • Medicare Basics
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Medicare & Other Health Insurance
  • Medicare Billings, Claims & Appeals
  • Health Care Disparities
  • Fraud & Abuse

—

  • COVID-19
  • Resources
  • Health Care Reform
  • Long-Term Care
  • CHA News

—

  • Advocacy & Policy
  • Letters and Comments to Policymakers
  • Legislative and Congressional Testimony
  • Policy Briefs

Send Us Comment

Do you have comments or concerns about your Medicare coverage? Issues regarding getting your needed prescriptions from your Part D plan, or a Medicare Advantage plan representative's marketing practices? Let us know at comments@cahealthadvocates.org.

We are dedicated to making Medicare's program work well for all beneficiaries. Your feedback from your own or your client's concerns and experiences with Medicare, will guide our Medicare advocacy efforts with key policy and decision-makers in both California and nationally with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Congress.

Archives

Donate Today

Footer

Sign up for our newsletter

Choose the news you'd like to receive

Important Links

  • About Us
  • Fact Sheets
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility Statement

Follow Us

Copyright © 2023 · California Health Advocates · Web Design by TWK Web and Print Design · Log in